By Martyns Kenkwo
As the 2027 general elections draw closer, Ndi Okigwe must confront an uncomfortable but necessary question: Does occupying a legislative seat automatically confer the right to return, or should another mandate be earned through demonstrable performance?
The question is particularly important in a political environment where incumbency is increasingly treated as an advantage that must be preserved, rather than a responsibility that must be justified. Some political officeholders appear to operate on the assumption that once elected, another term is theirs for the asking. Their argument, often implicit, is that they have occupied the seat before and should, therefore, be allowed to occupy it again.
This is particularly so in a clime where optics is everything and performance means nothing as long as you belong to a powerful clique that deploys the levers of power with brazen crudity.
But democracy does not operate on the principle of automatic renewal.
Public office is a trust, not a lifetime appointment. A legislative mandate is neither an inheritance nor a political retirement benefit. It is a temporary responsibility entrusted to an individual by the electorate, subject to periodic assessment.
And if the assessment is unsatisfactory, the people have every right to change the occupant.
*INCUMBENCY IS NOT AN ACHIEVEMENT*
There is a fundamental distinction between returning a performing lawmaker and returning someone simply because he has been there before.
The former may represent continuity; the latter could amount to institutionalised stagnation.
Experience is valuable, but only when it produces results.
Longevity in office is not proof of effectiveness, just as political familiarity does not automatically translate into competence.
The legislature is not a social club where membership is renewed through political connections, nor is it a ceremonial institution where attendance and occasional public appearances constitute meaningful representation.
Lawmakers are entrusted with serious constitutional responsibilities: making laws, scrutinising public expenditure, exercising oversight over government agencies, influencing national policies and defending the interests of their constituencies.
The electorate is, therefore, entitled to ask what a representative has accomplished with these responsibilities. Which legislative interventions have advanced the people’s interests? What significant policy contributions can be identified? How effectively has the representative influenced decisions affecting the constituency? What tangible opportunities have been attracted? What measurable difference has been made to the lives of ordinary constituents?
These are legitimate questions, not acts of political hostility.
A lawmaker seeking another mandate should welcome scrutiny, not resent it.
*THE POLITICS OF POLITICAL OCCUPANCY*
One of the greatest disservices to democratic development is the tendency to confuse political visibility with legislative effectiveness.
A representative may maintain an impressive political structure, attend numerous social functions, distribute occasional gifts and flood the media with photographs of political and social engagements.
Yet, when the publicity is stripped away, the electorate may struggle to identify substantial evidence of effective representation. They may not even remember seeing him ever since he came to seek their votes four years ago.
Unfortunately, our politics sometimes rewards the appearance of activity more generously than actual performance.
Motions are celebrated as achievements before their practical implications are established. Announcements are presented as completed projects. Routine constituency engagements are packaged as extraordinary interventions. Promises are repeatedly recycled, sometimes with new slogans, while the underlying challenges remain unresolved.
However, political communication cannot permanently substitute for public accountability.
The people are not blind. They know the difference between a project announced and one delivered, between a promise made and one fulfilled, between a representative who speaks for them and one who merely speaks about them.
The 2027 elections should, therefore, mark a departure from the politics of political packaging.
Okigwe must demand evidence, not advertisements; outcomes, not excuses; and measurable progress, not rehearsed explanations.
*WHEN CONTINUITY BECOMES A LIABILITY*
Continuity is frequently invoked as an argument for returning incumbents. Properly understood, continuity has merit. Legislative experience, institutional memory and established relationships can strengthen a representative’s effectiveness.
But continuity is not an end in itself. Its value depends entirely on what is being sustained.
If continuity preserves competence, integrity and productive representation, it is worth defending. If it perpetuates mediocrity, political complacency and unfulfilled promises, it becomes a liability.
Indeed, repeatedly returning an ineffective representative can send a dangerous message: that electoral approval is obtainable without corresponding performance.
That is how political entitlement takes root. The officeholder gradually becomes more concerned about maintaining political control than earning public confidence. Constituents are treated as electoral assets rather than citizens whose interests must be protected.
Eventually, the political conversation shifts from what the representative has done to how he can be returned.
That is precisely the mentality Okigwe must reject.
A legislative seat belongs to the people, not its occupant.
The people must never become so accustomed to a particular officeholder that they forget they have the constitutional power to demand better.
*OKIGWE MUST RAISE THE BAR*
For Okigwe Zone, the stakes are particularly significant. Our six local government areas cannot afford another political cycle in which electoral victories become ends in themselves, while the larger questions of development remain inadequately addressed.
Our young people need jobs, skills and opportunities to build sustainable livelihoods. Our farmers need productive support and access to markets. Our traders and small businesses need an enabling economic environment. Our communities need good roads and infrastructure, while our people deserve stronger representation in national affairs.
These challenges require lawmakers, who understand that representation is not merely about occupying a seat in Abuja. It is about influencing national decisions, building strategic relationships, pursuing development interventions and ensuring that the interests of the constituency are not relegated to the margins.
The Senate, in particular, demands intellectual depth, negotiating ability, courage, national perspective and an understanding of the machinery of government.
Okigwe Zone must, therefore, begin to assess its political choices against the demands of the office, rather than the convenience of political arrangements.
We must ask not only who wants to return, but who has earned the right to return. Not only who has the strongest political machinery, but who offers the strongest proposition for the future.
*A NEW FACE IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY A BETTER FACE*
Rejecting automatic political renewal does not mean embracing change indiscriminately. Neither does it mean that every newcomer is necessarily better than an incumbent.
The argument is for merit, not mere replacement. Every candidate, old or new, must be subjected to the same standards of scrutiny.
This is where the emergence of Attorney Dr Charles Chibuike Onyirimba and the Action Democratic Party introduces an important dimension to the political conversation in Okigwe Zone.
Onyirimba brings a combination of legal training, international professional exposure, diplomatic engagement and community leadership. His experience in the United States, leadership of the Igbo Union in Atlanta, involvement in the founding of the World Igbo Congress and service as Honorary Nigerian Consul in Atlanta, among several topnotch engagements, offer credentials that merit serious consideration.
His candidacy presents an opportunity to interrogate whether Okigwe is prepared to look beyond established political arrangements and consider a different leadership proposition.
But the ultimate test must remain what every candidate can offer, how credible the proposals are and whether the capacity exists to translate ambition into results.
The objective is not to replace one form of political entitlement with another. It is to establish a culture in which public office must be earned through competence, justified through performance and sustained through accountability.
*THE BALLOT MUST BE A VERDICT, NOT A REWARD FOR FAMILIARITY
*
Ultimately, the power to return or replace a lawmaker belongs to the electorate.
That power must be defended and not be surrendered to political godfathers, party establishments or individuals who have mistaken incumbency for ownership.
The ballot is not a loyalty certificate. It is a democratic instrument for assessing stewardship and determining who deserves another opportunity to serve.
Ndi Okigwe must resist the emotional manipulation that sometimes accompanies campaigns for automatic renewal. We must not be persuaded that rejecting an incumbent amounts to ingratitude, disloyalty or political hostility. A representative who has served well deserves consideration; one who has fallen short must answer for it; it’s as simple as that.
The same scrutiny must apply to everyone seeking our mandate.
In 2027, let the argument be about performance, capacity, integrity and the future of our people. Let no one assume that occupying a legislative seat is sufficient qualification for retaining it.
There is a profound difference between returning a lawmaker because his performance justifies continuity and returning him merely because of entrenched forces.
One advances democracy. The other risks holding it hostage to political complacency.
Okigwe Zone must choose wisely. We cannot afford to confuse political repetition with progress or mistake the preservation of familiar faces for the advancement of our collective interests.
RETURNING OR RETARDING? In 2027, Ndi Okigwe must choose progress over political entitlement.
*Martyns Kenkwo is a public affairs analyst based in Port Harcourt, Rivers State