Land and landed properties are one of the most valuable assets to possess. They are among the
few assets with the probability to increase significantly in value with little time. The fact that
Land appreciates faster in the cities is the main reason we have a steady increase in the number
of landowners registering their land in Abuja.
Abuja being the capital of Nigeria is a very strategic place to acquire landed property. The
opportunities associated with it can’t be overestimated as properties appreciate quickly in this
part of Nigeria. This fact alone is evident in the number of new buildings springing up in areas
that were hitherto labeled as Abuja suburb.
Evidently, lots of Nigerians are aware that owning a property in Abuja is one of the most certain
ways to increase wealth. As a result, Abuja witnessed a surge in the purchase of lands both in the
city and suburbs.
The uncontrollable surge in the acquisition of land especially in its suburb birthed some social
issues like:
– double allocation
– Court cases involving land
– No supporting infrastructures in place
– compensation issues
– Revocation by the government.
These and many other reasons led to the indefinite suspension of land allocation in the city of
Abuja. Each of the reasons will be highlighted sequentially in the following sections:
– Double allocations: While it is a standard practice for any land acquisition and development
firms ensure that the first person who makes payment get the proper
document acknowledging the change of ownership, greedy land agents with the help of their
associate took advantage of buyer’s naivety to sell the same land to multiple people. This, in turn,
leads to disagreement among multiple owners and unavoidable court cases.
– Court cases: The aforementioned and many other reasons are why we have so many land-related
cases in Abuja court. This problem is compounded by the bureaucratic delays common to
Nigerian courts. In order to accelerate the speed at which court cases are solved, the present minister of FCT, Abuja established the Land Use Allocation Committee (LAUAC). The
bulkiness of the cases also overwhelmed this new body.
– Compensation issues: The exploding number of court cases involving land issues undoubtedly
resulted in compensation and outside the court settlement for some parties. Yet, some were
adamant to abide by the terms.
– Revocations carried by past governments: While this is a general practice in most parts of
the country, the government also failed to hold up to its end of the bargain in most situations
involving compensation of the parties whose ancestral land were taken for state development
or any other purpose.
– No supporting infrastructures in place: As stated earlier, land acquisition was higher in the
suburbs. Lots of people were acquiring land in places where basic infrastructures have not been
provided for by the state. Majority of those places have no accessible roads, provision for
electricity and sewer lines. To curb haphazard growth veering from the city’s footprint they had
to stop allocation of land.
About Author: Editorial Staff at Rural Homes Ltd (Karmo Market Developer) is a team of real estate industry experts responsible for managing the company’s digital communication.
Copyright © 2018 , Rural Homes Ltd All rights reserved.